Bhutan Council for School Examination and Assessment (BCSEA)
board has decided not to conduct re-exam for the leaked English paper II. It is
very unfortunate for the students who haven’t got the leaked questions. The
chosen decisions among many options the committee had, doesn’t hold any water. It
is honestly unfair.
The most awaiting moment – the decision from the board came
as bombshell for the students. Almost everyone was expecting the board to
re-conduct the exam. Either parent of the students and the students themselves.
No other options could play fair in this case. There are
maximum numbers of students who haven’t gotten any idea about the leaked paper
and there are few pockets who proudly have written the paper. The only best
option is to redo the exam.
Why consider the marks in English I and abandon English II
when former examines mostly the grammar and language and later the literature
which expose students to poetry, drama, story etc.? Why should there be two
separate papers then? How logical it is to compare two complete different
things?
It is good reminiscence how I struggled to score good marks
in English. For almost every student English II is rescue from hassle of English
I. English II help students to get the good average marks.
The reasons prioritized by the board are cost at the first
place and then the logistics and hassle to students. Considering these reasons
and decides not to redo exam don’t at all play fair to students and parents who
work hard whole academic year. It is not the students illegally leaked the
questions. It is the ethical questions to the integrity and liability of person
who leaked the paper.
I hope the decision shall be reverse first to redo exam and
play fair to all students and then find the person behind for causing adversity
and fix accountability at the earliest.


