![]() |
| The bright sun from the shore. |
Sangay Duba's Random Thoughts
Good, bad, dirty that I think and thought:Mannerism བྱོན་པར་ལེགས་སོ།།
Monday, January 19, 2026
Hope on the Distant Horizon
Sunday, October 26, 2025
Reflective Insights on Integrity-Driven and Adaptive Leadership in Infrastructure Decision-Making
1. Introduction
The
development of Bhutan's infrastructure has been a significant focus since the
1960s, beginning with the construction of the first road connecting Phuentsholing
to Thimphu. Over the years, the government has prioritized building roads,
suspension bridges, and public buildings, which have contributed to social and
economic progress. However, despite substantial investments, the construction
industry faces ongoing challenges related to quality, innovation, and
sustainability. Roads often break down too soon, which means they need to be fixed over and over again, which puts a strain on budgets. This shows that planning and execution are not perfect.
As a professional in the Department of Surface Transport,
I have encountered the complexities of infrastructure decision-making. A
recurring dilemma is whether to construct a shorter, higher-quality road or a
longer, potentially lower-quality one. This decision is not merely technical;
it also involves moral and leadership considerations, balancing political
desires, public needs, and ethical responsibilities. Frameworks like Moral DNA
and the RIGHT (Rules, Integrity, Good, Harm, Truth) framework can guide
decision-making to ensure it is both technically and morally sound. The Cynefin
Framework aids in understanding the nature of these problems and determining
appropriate responses.
In this essay, I contemplate the ways in which these frameworks can improve leadership practices in my workplace. I aim to lead
cultural change, improve the workplace for my team, navigate contradictions,
and transition from compliance-based management to adaptive leadership.
2. Applying Moral DNA and RIGHT
Framework to a KPI or Initiative.
Recognizing my Moral DNA as a
JUDGE, I understand the importance of balancing obedience, honesty, and reason
in leadership. These elements are crucial when making decisions that impact
budgets, timelines, and quality outcomes in public infrastructure. I have
revised the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) from "Develop a framework for
Action Research" to "Enhance long-term road performance and user
satisfaction through ethically guided and evidence-based budget
decisions." This new KPI emphasizes results-oriented performance, focusing
on sustainability, accountability, and user-centric service delivery.
Utilizing the RIGHT framework, I ensure that our decision-making processes adhere to professional and moral standards:
- R – Rule: Adhere to national standards, policies, and engineering codes, ensuring transparency in budget prioritization.
- I – Integrity: Maintain honesty and consistency in decisions, resisting pressures for short-term gains.
- G – Good: Aim for long-term benefits for the public, considering the broader impacts of road quality on safety and access.
- H – Harm: Identify and mitigate potential harms, recognizing that low-quality construction can lead to greater long-term costs and loss of public trust.
- T – Truth: Uphold honesty in all communications, ensuring that decisions are based on accurate information and realistic assessments.
By systematically applying the
RIGHT framework, I can align our department's decision-making with ethical
principles, reinforcing the idea that ethical leadership and technical
excellence are interconnected.
3. Seismic Shift – From compliance
-based decision making to Adaptive Leadership
A significant shift I aim to
implement is moving from a compliance-based decision-making culture to one that
is flexible, evidence-based, and morally grounded. Historically, the focus has
been on procedural compliance and short-term budget efficiency, which stifles
innovation and long-term thinking. Engineers often prioritize immediate
physical goals over sustainable, high-quality outcomes.
To facilitate this transition, I will employ the Cynefin framework for adaptive leadership:
- In complicated domains, where expert knowledge can provide answers (example: determining design thickness or selecting pavement materials), the decision approach should be Sense – Analyze – Respond. Experts analyze multiple solutions, compare life-cycle costs, and recommend the best option.
- In complex domains, where outcomes are uncertain or emerging (for example, testing alternative materials or innovative designs), the approach should shift to Probe–Sense–Respond. Here, pilot projects and iterative learning become essential before full-scale implementation. I have already proposed the research and development idea and am now in the process of developing a framework to encourage and enable innovation.
Success metrics will also evolve; rather than merely measuring project completion, I will assess long-term performance, maintenance expenses, and the integration of new ideas. This shift will cultivate a culture that bases decisions on facts and values, striking a balance between efficiency and sustainability.
4. Creating a Supportive Environment for
My Team
The effectiveness of my leadership hinges on fostering an environment conducive to learning, creativity, and ethical dialogue. Many engineers face strict deadlines and high public expectations, leaving little room for reflection or innovation. To improve this environment, I commit to two key initiatives:
- Establishing Continuous Learning Platforms
I will implement structured "learning from practice" sessions, allowing engineers to share experiences, challenges, and ethical dilemmas in a supportive setting. This initiative aims to promote ongoing improvement and innovation, with documented insights informing future project planning and policy adjustments.
- Encourage Openness and Honesty
I will create a safe space for
team members to voice concerns and propose new ideas without fear of
repercussions. During project meetings, I will integrate discussions around the
RIGHT framework, embedding ethical reasoning into our daily practices.
5. Leading Culture Change
Transforming the culture within the public construction sector is a gradual process that requires alignment of values, behaviors, and systems. My goal is to shift the focus from speed and physical accomplishments to long-term quality and sustainability.
To achieve this, I will:
- Model Integrity
and Accountability: I will
demonstrate through my actions that ethical decision-making and honesty
are paramount, reinforcing that prioritizing quality is the norm.
- Integrate Reflection into Project Reviews: I will
initiate "post-project reflection" sessions that evaluate not
only technical outcomes but also the ethical considerations that
influenced decisions, similar to the Asian Development Bank & World
Bank funded projects.
- Recognize and Reward Innovation: I will advocate for
institutional recognition of teams or individuals, which I have already
initiated in the department, who explore new technologies or methods that
enhance quality and reduce costs.
Cultural change requires sustained effort, but the
potential benefits are significant. An organization that values innovation and
ethics embeds these principles into identity.
6.
Navigating
Paradoxes
Leadership
often involves managing paradoxes, where conflicting priorities must coexist. A
critical paradox I face is the tension between the need to build more roads and
the obligation to construct better roads. While there is pressure to enhance
connectivity quickly, professional integrity demands that we prioritize safety,
durability, and cost-effectiveness.
To address this paradox, I will adopt a balanced approach:
- Phased development: Implementing full standards for critical sections while gradually improving others as funding permits.
- Life Cycle cost Analysis: Demonstrating to policymakers that investing in quality upfront can lead to long-term savings.
- Community Engagement: Involving stakeholders in understanding the consequences of poor construction practices to align expectations with sustainable approaches.
Navigating this paradox requires a commitment to
honesty, data-driven decision-making, and ethical reasoning.
7.
Conclusion
The challenges facing Bhutan's infrastructure extend beyond technical issues; they highlight the need for improved moral leadership, adaptive thinking, and cultural transformation. By leveraging the Moral DNA and RIGHT frameworks, I can ensure that my decisions align with both professional standards and ethical values.
My shift from compliance-based
to adaptive, integrity-driven leadership will shape my decision-making and
influence the broader infrastructure governance landscape in Bhutan. By
fostering a supportive environment for learning and ethical dialogue, leading
cultural change toward quality and innovation, and addressing contradictions
with clarity, I aim to build not just roads but also trust, accountability, and
resilience within our systems.
Ultimately, leadership transcends infrastructure development; it encompasses the cultivation of integrity, creativity, and moral purpose in every endeavor. As I embark on this journey, I aspire to ensure that each kilometer of road constructed symbolizes not only progress but also a commitment to ethical principles and sustainable practices.
Submitted by:
Sangay Duba
Executive Engineer
Cohort 22
EID:
20150105089
Department of
Surface Transport
Friday, April 4, 2025
Key Insights from the Farm Road Maintenance Manual Training for Local Government Officials
It was an honor and a privilege
to engage with nearly all Local Government (LG) officials during the training
on the Farm Road Maintenance Manual, 2023 developed by the Department of Surface
Transport. The training was conducted across various regions, starting with the
western districts, followed by the southern and eastern regions. Participants
included all those involved in farm road maintenance—village Tshogpas, Gups,
Mangmis, Geog and Dzongkhag Engineers, and even senior officials such as
Dzongrabs and Drungpas. In certain cases, Geog Administrative Officers
represented their respective Geogs. This ensured that the intended target
group, for whom the manual was designed as a technical and advisory tool, was
successfully reached.
Delivering the training was
physically demanding, requiring long hours of standing and explaining the
significance of farm road maintenance. However, the accomplishment lies in
equipping LG officials with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively
manage and maintain these crucial roads.
Beyond sharing knowledge, the
training also provided me with valuable insights into the real, grassroots
challenges faced in farm road maintenance. It reinforced the fact that much
remains to be done to achieve the shared objective of keeping these roads in
good condition. Well-maintained farm roads ultimately contribute to the
socio-economic development of our communities, ensuring better accessibility
and connectivity.
A well-functioning farm road network will also play a crucial role in supporting the Gelephu Mindfulness City, facilitating the transportation of local produce and fostering collective growth at individual, community, and national levels. This highlights the importance of farm roads and the timeliness of the training.
![]() |
| Lhuentse, Trashigang & Bumthang Dzongkhag |
Key Takeaways from the Training
- Mindset of Local Leaders and Political Influence
It was surprising to hear some local leaders express regret that the training came too late, as they only had one to two years left in their term. However, the duration of their tenure should not be the focus—what truly matters is that everyone involved in farm road maintenance understands its importance and best practices. Local leaders, past and present, should take ownership of farm roads as custodians of their communities. The mindset of local leaders significantly impacts grassroots development, governance, and public welfare.
- Need for Minimum Educational Qualifications for Local Leaders
With decentralization embedded in
the Constitution, ensuring that local leaders meet a minimum educational
requirement has become essential. Given their role in planning, budgeting, and
implementing numerous developmental activities, it would be beneficial to
mandate at least a Class 12 or Bachelor’s degree qualification. This would not
only improve efficiency but also enhance the execution of plans and priorities
within local governance. Leaders with a strong educational background are more likely
to foster inclusive, transparent, and development-focused governance, driving
sustainable progress. In contrast, those with a short-term or self-serving
approach may hinder long-term community welfare.
![]() |
| Pema Gatshel & Samdrup Jongkhag Dzongkhag |
- Budget Constraints and Financial Challenges
- Inadequate budgeting and budget constraints limit the effective execution of FR projects.
- Non-uniform budget allocations create disparities in project implementation.
- Low priority for maintenance activities leads to rapid road deterioration.
- The rigidity of budget allocation guidelines restricts flexibility in addressing urgent needs.
- Lack of Ownership & Ineffective Road User Groups (RUGs)
- Weak community and institutional ownership lead to poor maintenance of roads.
- Ineffective or absent RUGs reduce local participation in road upkeep.
- The lack of incentives for RUGs affects their engagement in maintenance work.
- Drainage Issues & Climate Change Effects
- Inadequate or poorly designed cross-drainages cause waterlogging and accelerate road deterioration.
- Heavy rainfall and extreme weather events worsen the impact of poor drainage.
- Climate-resilient features are not adequately incorporated in road construction.
- Geographical & Terrain Challenges
- Rugged and difficult terrain makes Farm Road construction and maintenance challenging.
- Many Farm Roads exceed the permissible design gradient, leading to faster deterioration.
- Some roads pass through marshy locations, requiring special engineering solutions.
- Land Acquisition & Social Clearance Issues
- Delays in obtaining social clearance hinder timely project execution.
- Compensation issues arise when Farm Road alignment passes through private lands.
- Public grievances related to land acquisition impact project acceptance.
- Procurement & Machinery Availability Challenges
- Machinery required for road construction and maintenance is often unavailable during critical times.
- Centralized procurement processes at the Dzongkhag level delay machinery allocation.
- Disparities in hiring rates for equipment create inconsistencies in restoration works execution.
- Lack of Technical Expertise & Skilled Personnel
- Local government officials often lack the technical expertise needed for road construction and maintenance.
- Shortages of engineers and technical personnel affect project planning and execution.
- Limited contract management and administration skills lead to inefficiencies.
- Planning & Monitoring Deficiencies
- Inadequate feasibility studies result in inefficient road alignments and resource utilization.
- A lack of proper monitoring leads to substandard construction quality.
- Poor coordination between local government and technical personnel delays decision-making.
- Bureaucratic & Administrative Challenges
- Lengthy procurement processes cause delays in project implementation.
- A rigid reporting hierarchy for monsoon damage slows down repair works.
- Political interference sometimes affects the prioritization of FR projects.
- Poor Quality of Construction & Maintenance
- Improper design specifications and poor construction quality reduce the lifespan of Farm Roads.
- Lack of adherence to design standards and construction guidelines leads to frequent road failures.
- Coordination issues in constructing different pavement layers result in uneven road surfaces.
- Mismatch between Policies & Ground Realities
- Existing policies and design standards do not always align with practical field conditions.
- Localized challenges require more flexible approaches, which are often restricted by rigid policies.
- The gap between public expectations and policy priorities causes dissatisfaction.
Monday, October 17, 2022
Acknowledgement
The journey of my study was filled with recurrent question of ‘Why CST, why not Australia or other countries for masters?’, from anyone who I informed that I am on study leave to College of Science and Technology. I considered this on positive note, as the lone civil servant in the first batch of the Masters in Construction Management course, I was dedicated to upgrading my knowledge and abilities in the local context to find solutions to problems unique to Bhutan. Self-tenacity overruled all barriers along the journey of this study.
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Royal Government of Bhutan, College of Science and Technology and Department of Roads for the opportunity to pursue masters my graduate studies.
Sincere gratitude to Dr. Kazuhiro Marumatsu, Assistant Professor, Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, who despite his busy schedules, provided value guidance and mentorship in the development of proof of concept model. Your time has had a great impact on the research study. Thanks to Madam Karma Kelzang Yuden for your time for editing the draft of the chapter on proof of concept.
I would also like to acknowledge the time and expert opinion of interviewees mostly heads of the organizations, who made themselves available for the interview, despite their very busy schedule. Their inputs and insights made this thesis possible.
I would also like to thank the Research Supervisory Committee for their valuable feedback and critical comments that helped to fine tune my thesis.
Finally, my endearing and enduring gratefulness to my family, who have remained the bedrock of my study.
Sunday, April 10, 2022
རྩོམ་རྗོད་ཚིག་བདུན་མ། - ༦
བདེ་བ་དེན་ཅུག་སེམས་ཅན་རྣམས།།
ནད་མེད་སྡུག་མེད་བདེ་སྐྱིད་སྨྱོང་།།
སྨོན་ལམ་ཏབ་པའི་རྟེན་འབྲེལ་ལ།།
ཚེ་ལུང་གནས་ལ་གནས་སྐོར་ནས།།
བདག་གི་ནུ་གཅུང་ལོ་གསུམ་ལ།།
སྐུན་མཚམས་བཅད་པའི་རྟེན་འབྲེལ་གྱི།
འགྲོ་དྲུག་སེམས་ཅན་རྣམས་ལ་བདེ་བར་ཤོག།
![]() |
| འགྲོ་ལམ་ཟམ། |
![]() |
| ཚེ་ལུང་གནས། |
![]() |
| ལྷ་ཁང་། |
![]() |
| ཟམ། |














